Liberalism: the Chain of Lies: Difference between revisions
Corax4Dracon (talk | contribs) m (removed numbers before titles) |
Corax4Dracon (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===Democracy as a synonym to freedom=== | ===Democracy as a synonym to freedom=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
Usually when people are talking about so-called Western values: honor, love, humanity, kind and loving attitude to life, they use the term “democracy”, “democratic”. As an opposite to absolute monarchy. Muslims that are now on the way of war to Europe and America also use this term in this meaning, to bash us. They do not hate “democracy” for what it is, as they simply lack brain to understand the politics. What they hate in us and what they are going to wipe from the face of Earth, are our values and culture: our respect for freedom, for personal responsibility [which personal freedom derives from], for privacy, for personal choice, our soft loving attitude to women, children, animals, life itself, and our great respect for family and human sexuality in its beautiful organic way. What they want is: women beating; child raping; bashing any and all sexuality and a sight of human body; shortening long life of our women – since sexuality is a life force (their wives in Middle East usually die young of severe beatings and too early and too much pregnancies); severe penalties, torturous bodily punishments. | Usually when people are talking about so-called Western values: honor, love, humanity, kind and loving attitude to life, they use the term “democracy”, “democratic”. As an opposite to absolute monarchy. Muslims that are now on the way of war to Europe and America also use this term in this meaning, to bash us. They do not hate “democracy” for what it is, as they simply lack brain to understand the politics. What they hate in us and what they are going to wipe from the face of Earth, are our values and culture: our respect for freedom, for personal responsibility [which personal freedom derives from], for privacy, for personal choice, our soft loving attitude to women, children, animals, life itself, and our great respect for family and human sexuality in its beautiful organic way. What they want is: women beating; child raping; bashing any and all sexuality and a sight of human body; shortening long life of our women – since sexuality is a life force (their wives in Middle East usually die young of severe beatings and too early and too much pregnancies); severe penalties, torturous bodily punishments. | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
===Tolerance=== | ===Tolerance=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
Once we had a program on TV about travel. Russian men traveled in Holland and was rather amazed to find that this tolerant country is not only full of jihadist openly terrorist muslims, but they even openly harassed him. The one harassing him was some popular islamic jihadist (since jihadists are popular in Holland) who preached to kill any Dutch for intolerance (note: jihadist advocating jihad for intolerance). And xian preacher commented it like this: | Once we had a program on TV about travel. Russian men traveled in Holland and was rather amazed to find that this tolerant country is not only full of jihadist openly terrorist muslims, but they even openly harassed him. The one harassing him was some popular islamic jihadist (since jihadists are popular in Holland) who preached to kill any Dutch for intolerance (note: jihadist advocating jihad for intolerance). And xian preacher commented it like this: | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
===Diversity aka Multiculturalism=== | ===Diversity aka Multiculturalism=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
The term “Diversity” literally means when there is different things around. Different people of different races of different background walking together in peace. Great thing, isn’t it? But does it really apply to modern Europe? | The term “Diversity” literally means when there is different things around. Different people of different races of different background walking together in peace. Great thing, isn’t it? But does it really apply to modern Europe? | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
[[File:Mona sahlin.jpg|alt=She does not propagandise DIVERSITY. She says “we have no culture”. She propagandises islamic culture alone, where is MULTIculture?|thumb|605x605px|She does not propagandise ''DIVERSITY''. She says “we have no culture”. She propagandises islamic culture alone, where is ''MULTI''culture?]] | [[File:Mona sahlin.jpg|alt=She does not propagandise DIVERSITY. She says “we have no culture”. She propagandises islamic culture alone, where is MULTIculture?|thumb|605x605px|She does not propagandise ''DIVERSITY''. She says “we have no culture”. She propagandises islamic culture alone, where is ''MULTI''culture?]] | ||
[[File:Monasahlin 2.jpg|alt=“allah ska med” means “allah be with you” – where is DIVERSITY?|center|frame|“allah ska med” means “allah be with you” – where is ''DIVERSITY''?]] | [[File:Monasahlin 2.jpg|alt=“allah ska med” means “allah be with you” – where is DIVERSITY?|center|frame|“allah ska med” means “allah be with you” – where is ''DIVERSITY''?]] | ||
“The White Races of Europe should be destroyed and replaced with a race of Eurasian-Negroids who can be easily controlled by the ruling elite.” <br /> “We [jews] intend to turn Europe into q mixed race of Asians and Negros… ruled over by the Jews” <br /> Jewish EU “founding father” <br /> Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi <br /> – “Praktischer Idealismus” 1925 | “The White Races of Europe should be destroyed and replaced with a race of Eurasian-Negroids who can be easily controlled by the ruling elite.” <br /> “We [jews] intend to turn Europe into q mixed race of Asians and Negros… ruled over by the Jews” <br /> Jewish EU “founding father” <br /> Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi <br /> – “Praktischer Idealismus” 1925 | ||
Line 121: | Line 126: | ||
===Equality=== | ===Equality=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
[[File:Girl in kebab.jpg|alt=14 years old girl was gang-raped and beaten to death, and her flash put in kebab to be sold as food in Britain – WHERE IS EQUALITY?|left|frame|14 years old girl was gang-raped and beaten to death, and her flash put in kebab to be sold as food in Britain – WHERE IS ''EQUALITY?'']] | [[File:Girl in kebab.jpg|alt=14 years old girl was gang-raped and beaten to death, and her flash put in kebab to be sold as food in Britain – WHERE IS EQUALITY?|left|frame|14 years old girl was gang-raped and beaten to death, and her flash put in kebab to be sold as food in Britain – WHERE IS ''EQUALITY?'']] | ||
“Freedom, equality, fraternity” – all of these things do not exist in Nature in their pure form. They are made artificially to make life comfortable. People are not born equal. However, as civilization goes, people evolve to approximately equalizing their abilities because so is their understanding of happiness; for example, fire weapons are a gift of civilization and equalize physically strong and weak people. So is freedom: She is a gift of personal responsibility and self-sufficiency, independence. Freedom and parasitism are incompatible, and to be independent is very hard. So is fraternity: Love usually exists in blood bonds that are created by procreation. To be loved you have to have your own around you, and to make your own you have to give birth to them. It is physically hard but it is the only way to get fraternity – you can’t be loved by other species, other races, wild animals and kikes, because Nature bound love to blood relation. | “Freedom, equality, fraternity” – all of these things do not exist in Nature in their pure form. They are made artificially to make life comfortable. People are not born equal. However, as civilization goes, people evolve to approximately equalizing their abilities because so is their understanding of happiness; for example, fire weapons are a gift of civilization and equalize physically strong and weak people. So is freedom: She is a gift of personal responsibility and self-sufficiency, independence. Freedom and parasitism are incompatible, and to be independent is very hard. So is fraternity: Love usually exists in blood bonds that are created by procreation. To be loved you have to have your own around you, and to make your own you have to give birth to them. It is physically hard but it is the only way to get fraternity – you can’t be loved by other species, other races, wild animals and kikes, because Nature bound love to blood relation. | ||
Line 132: | Line 137: | ||
===Ethics=== | ===Ethics=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
[https://odysee.com/@CrusaderGal:7/Harvard_Medicines_Anti_White_Apartheid:d BLM activist advocates white genocide at Harvard] | [https://odysee.com/@CrusaderGal:7/Harvard_Medicines_Anti_White_Apartheid:d BLM activist advocates white genocide at Harvard] | ||
Line 165: | Line 170: | ||
===A religion of peace=== | ===A religion of peace=== | ||
[[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies# | [[Liberalism: the Chain of Lies#top|Back to The Chain]] | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5fVgM0gLQ Sorry, liberals. There’s only 1 interpretation of Islam — Muhammad’s] | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5fVgM0gLQ Sorry, liberals. There’s only 1 interpretation of Islam — Muhammad’s] |
Latest revision as of 09:16, 11 November 2022
Liberalism: the Chain of Lies
Zohar (1, 160a): Jews MUST ALWAYS try to deceive Gentiles.
Schabbouth Hag (6d): Jews may swear falsely by the use of subterfuge wording.
“And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” – Qur’an (3:54)
Ah, Lord GOD! Surely, thou hast greatly deceived this people. Jeremiah 4:10
For this cause, God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie. 2 Thessalonians 2:11
[quotes taken from 3 abrahamic [i.e. jew-invented] religions: christianity, islam, judaism]
Because of being steeped in, believing in, and living a lie, in the advanced stages of Christianity, the Christian takes on an artificial appearance and begins to look like the lie:
The well-known pasty look with the smiley mask. The lie emerges in the physical self. – Exposing Christianity
I wish to share some Pagan Nordic legend that I feel much related to it. All pagan legends has spiritual allegory behind them dealing with chakras, parts of the soul etc. – things related to magic and witchcraft. However, some of them has political message also. High Priestess Maxine mentioned Trojan horse as a possible allegory of jewish takeover of the Gentile country through infiltration. I wish to share smth that cries out to me and so brilliantly explains how any enemy program works that I have never seen before:
The Wolf Fenrir could destroy any existing chain. According the legend the dwarves, evil-natured little creatures, presented Odin with Gleipnir, a shackle made of six mythical ingredients: the sound of a cat’s feet, the roots of a mountain, a bear’s sinews, a woman’s beard, a fish’s breath, and a bird’s spit. It proved itself the only chain Fenrir could not destroy.
If we look at the ingredients, we see one thing that unites them all: they all DO NOT EXIST. Something that do not exist works much better in destroying smb’s freedom than anything that does exist because all existing things has their end. Dwarfs, as evil little creatures they are, knew it well.
It is incredible, but if we examine any and every specific credo of liberalism, we will find with every credo that such thing ALSO DOES NOT EXIST. That such thing is either logically and existentially impossible, based on nothing, on a myth or is a logical mistake. Or it exists but have nothing to do with liberalism.
Let us take just 6 most popular bulwarks of liberalism. Maybe the legend is not about this specifically, but we will see, that they work the absolutely same way.
Democracy as a synonym to freedom
Usually when people are talking about so-called Western values: honor, love, humanity, kind and loving attitude to life, they use the term “democracy”, “democratic”. As an opposite to absolute monarchy. Muslims that are now on the way of war to Europe and America also use this term in this meaning, to bash us. They do not hate “democracy” for what it is, as they simply lack brain to understand the politics. What they hate in us and what they are going to wipe from the face of Earth, are our values and culture: our respect for freedom, for personal responsibility [which personal freedom derives from], for privacy, for personal choice, our soft loving attitude to women, children, animals, life itself, and our great respect for family and human sexuality in its beautiful organic way. What they want is: women beating; child raping; bashing any and all sexuality and a sight of human body; shortening long life of our women – since sexuality is a life force (their wives in Middle East usually die young of severe beatings and too early and too much pregnancies); severe penalties, torturous bodily punishments.
Now, why they say they bash democracy? Do all their atrocities not exist in democracy? Has this all nothing to do with democratic state?
Lenin, mass-murderer, mass-torturer, jew, imposer of “democratic state” on Russia, has another opinion: he says that democracy IS a dictatorship, moreover – in its most brutal form. The difference is, while feudalism is a dictatorship of the strongest, while capitalism is a dictatorship of the wealthiest, the democracy is a dictatorship of the lowest, worst educated, most pour and most mongrelized classes. He calls it “dictatorship of the proletariat”.
“This means replacing democracy for the rich by democracy for the poor”.
– “Democracy” and Dictatorship by Lenin
In other words instead of the dictatorship of this:
You have a dictatorship of this:
And the above is not metaphorical. The first photo is a family of Russian Tsar – “an oppressor“. The second are those who are nowadays “working class” in Russia – “the oppressed” according Lenin – “working class” since Russia has no Western type of welfare, in the meanwhile they do to Russian women the above.[2]
Sweden, a constitutional monarchy, dominated by Social Democrats from 1917 to nowadays, [though only now] became number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.[3]
Surpassed by what? By Lesotho? Is Lesotho an absolute monarchy?
The Lesotho Government is a parliamentary or constitutional monarchy. The Prime Minister has executive authority. The King serves a largely ceremonial function; he no longer possesses any executive authority. The Democratic Congress leads a coalition government in the National Assembly, the lower house of parliament.
– Absolutely same governmental structure as in Sweden.[4]
Basic human right is to have your life protected, to not be raped, beaten up and murdered, right? According 2011 research Afghanistan, Congo, Pakistan, India and Somalia emerge as most deadly places to be female [along with Sweden and Lesotho as first rape states]. Violence, dismal healthcare and brutal poverty make Afghanistan the world’s most dangerous country for women, with Congo a close second due to horrific levels of rape, a Thomson Reuters Foundation expert poll said on Wednesday. Pakistan, India and Somalia ranked third, fourth and fifth, respectively, in the global survey of perceptions of threats ranging from domestic abuse and economic discrimination to female foeticide, genital mutilation and acid attacks. [5]
– Probably these are absolute monarchies?
From Wikipedia we see the very same trend as with 20th century imperial Russia in most of them: in approximately the middle of 20 century the absolute monarchy was invaded by communists, they created democratic state there, and the long period of civil war began [characterized by utmost brutality]. In the end of it, some Islamic or non-islamic republic with elected parliament dominated by communists and/or islamists was established. Afghanistan, Congo and Somalia are classic examples of such pattern: democratic state – civil war – eternal civil war; OR democratic state – civil war – Islamic state. We see special link between democratization and islamization through bloody cannibalistic civil war.
I mentioned Russia with her Tsars. Russia was the purest example of the absolute, restrained by nothing, un-limited monarchy until Bolshevik and Menshevik communist jews gave us democratic state, which was the very next day proceeded by a longest and bloodiest civil war in our history ending in the Union of Social Soviet Republics. This Union took 100+ million human lives, which surpasses all wars ever led by Russian Empire at all.
Pakistan is a democratic parliamentary federal republic, The Democratic Republic of the Congo speaks for itself, and the last, India, according Wikipedia, is the “world’s most populous democracy”.
So according to this research we see that:
• muslim rapists and murderers are moving from war-torn Democratic Republics of Somali and Congo to the as well Democratic Republics of Germany and France – from one democracy to another – to make the last ones also war-torn.
• Democracy by itself does not guarantee freedom, human rights and Earth paradise
• Muslim murderers and rapists rallying and shouting “Democracy go to hell!! We want only islam!!” is not about bashing democratic state since themselves came out of it, it’s about bashing Western values: respect for life, for freedom, for privacy, for women, for civilization, for science and progress, for music and arts, for human sexuality and beauty, for everything that is beautiful, that is high and that is of Satan. It’s bashing White European tradition vs islamic terrorist tradition. It’s bashing pro-life ideology vs pro-death jihadist one.
Tolerance
Once we had a program on TV about travel. Russian men traveled in Holland and was rather amazed to find that this tolerant country is not only full of jihadist openly terrorist muslims, but they even openly harassed him. The one harassing him was some popular islamic jihadist (since jihadists are popular in Holland) who preached to kill any Dutch for intolerance (note: jihadist advocating jihad for intolerance). And xian preacher commented it like this:
“It is intolerant to kill people for intolerance”
Probably this White xian preacher was rather backwards and conservative according these new jihad since he did not only refuse to bless gay couple, but he dared even to be against wiping his country for intolerance!
However, since he was xian he did not get the point: not only it is intolerant to kill for intolerance, but also there is nothing tolerant about this new “tolerance” at all.
The tolerance to jihad is jihad itself. Because having tolerance to smth existentially means being it yourself.
You consider yourself so tolerant…
Your little child come to the swimming pool and is raped there Refugees Sexually Molesting Children in Germany. Because you accepted “so pour refugees” on the right here. Where is your tolerance to your only child (since feminists hardly permit even one child)? – Nowhere.
Your 75-years old mother who fought the World War 2 and survived communist occupation to bring you up, to feed you she worked all her life as slave (since women raise their children alone under feminism)… is sexually harassed in German street by monsters from Syria you accepted African “Refugees” sexually harass 75 Year old German Grandmother. Where is your tolerance to the one granted you life? – Nowhere.
Your Deutsche Bank is bankrupt, you spend 55+ billions on rapefugees yearly, they enter your countries with crying only one word “money! money!”, they demand TV in their rooms and food like in “their countries” never ever gained anything of what they demand: ungrateful refugees, they complain on slow internet and “bad service”: The ‘Refugees’ in Europe, Act Like Disappointed Tourists; they go to your supermarket to just take everything they want for free while molesting elderly there: Refugees abuse elderly Germany
Where is your tolerance to your economy and those who built it for you? – Nowhere.
Feminists talk about how traditional family with children is an oppression. Where is their tolerance to the future and life of their race? Where is their mercy to the aborted White children? Where is their compassion to the souls of our Ancestors who cannot reincarnate and therefore wither on the astral? – Nowhere, because it is an oppression. Whole Race must extinct for the sake of not oppressing its women: White women are getting fed up Nevertheless, Feminist Initiative did more than any other party to open Swedish boarders for woman-beaters, rapists and murderers.
Speaking about Ancestors… you had beautiful Pagan temple your forebears left for you in Norway… but you voted (you “voted” since you have a “democracy”) for such person to be your minister who ordered your forebears’ temple to be bulldozed: About how Nationalism has lost all Meaning. Your government build mosques and synagogues but bulldoze your temples. Where is your tolerance to your heritage? To your legacy? To your culture? – It is NOWHERE.
“Free Kisses for Refugees”
– German Girl enters Refugee Camp with “Free Hugs” Sign
Speaking about jewish feminists. They teach you not to marry your White men, instead they do videos with many Race traitors like the one on the right (or just type in youtube “my journey to islam” or “marry muslim”) that insight you to marry monsters who beat you to death, grant them “free kisses” and wear burka to please their g-d. Where is your tolerance to the desire of your own heart? To your own happiness? To your own freedom of choice your mothers fought for so long against other abrahamic religion, xianity, – long before these feminists came to power – WHERE IS YOUR TOLERANCE TO YOURSELF? – Nowhere.
You talk about tolerance but you have no tolerance to yourself, let alone your family members and country. And your xian preacher is the one revealing to you that it’s not tolerant to kill people for intolerance…………….
Diversity aka Multiculturalism
The term “Diversity” literally means when there is different things around. Different people of different races of different background walking together in peace. Great thing, isn’t it? But does it really apply to modern Europe?
In Europe:
1. You have to wear burka or you will be raped Muslims in Italy explaining how women should be dressed
2. Your law is not cared about, only Sharia law is “Who Cares About the Canadian Laws,” Says Muslim Refugee in Canada!
3. Your president tells you, you have to accept crime Merkel on muslim attacking Germans: we must accept that immigrants are more criminal
4. German citizen is set to prison for denying jewish lie of holyhoax German ‘Nazi grandma’ sentenced to 10 months in prison for Holocaust denial
5. Danish girls are set in prison for using spray to prevent rape Danish 17-year-old girl who used a pepper spray to fight off a rapist near migrant asylum centre is told SHE will be prosecuted for carrying the weapon
6. German men are set in prison for defending their women from rape Head of German Anti-Migrant Group Faces Prosecution for Wearing Anti-Rape T-Shirt
7. If you are German better not to procreate Jew Gevorg Gysi: all Gernans are Nazi and it is good that they do not procreate
8. Don’t build Norwegian temples in Norway or they’ll be bulldozed About how Nationalism has lost all Meaning
9. If you are Swedish in Sweden, prepare to be hated by your government Mona Sahlin’s Anti-Swedish rants
10. Your ethnic flag is not welcome. Either drop it or you will be beaten Muslim, in a full Burka, charges and attacks American Family and their Flag
11. Your children have to either fight for ISIL or be beaten to death ISIS ‘Poster Girl’ Samra Kesinovic ‘Beaten To Death’ In Syria
You are not allowed to be yourself, to be White, to procreate, to build your temples, to dress and make up according your traditions, to trust in your Gods, to come out with the flag of your country, the only thing you ARE allowed is to be slave muslim wife and fight for ISIL – WHERE IS DIVERSITY HERE!!???
I can tell you that under Apartheid during colonialism there WAS a diversity. White people were strong and not threatened by worldwide genocide by subhuman fanatics. We had power and rulership, and under our rulership others were allowed to stay themselves as far as they do not harm us and the Earth. Now under their rulership we are genocided, the economy of the world is ruined and the environment is destroyed.
“The White Races of Europe should be destroyed and replaced with a race of Eurasian-Negroids who can be easily controlled by the ruling elite.”
“We [jews] intend to turn Europe into q mixed race of Asians and Negros… ruled over by the Jews”
Jewish EU “founding father”
Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi
– “Praktischer Idealismus” 1925
WHERE IS DIVERSITY RIGHT HERE!!??
This is a diversity between one Eurasian-Negroids and the other Eurasian-Negroids, right?
Let’s ask your new master, where is your diversity:
“Diversity go to hell! We want only islam” [rally in Berlin]
Equality
“Freedom, equality, fraternity” – all of these things do not exist in Nature in their pure form. They are made artificially to make life comfortable. People are not born equal. However, as civilization goes, people evolve to approximately equalizing their abilities because so is their understanding of happiness; for example, fire weapons are a gift of civilization and equalize physically strong and weak people. So is freedom: She is a gift of personal responsibility and self-sufficiency, independence. Freedom and parasitism are incompatible, and to be independent is very hard. So is fraternity: Love usually exists in blood bonds that are created by procreation. To be loved you have to have your own around you, and to make your own you have to give birth to them. It is physically hard but it is the only way to get fraternity – you can’t be loved by other species, other races, wild animals and kikes, because Nature bound love to blood relation.
For example. Men and women are naturally born unequal. But through division of their efforts in organized civilization – women giving their all in feminine jobs, that have a lot of use without breaking women’s delicate bodies, and men concentrating in masculine ones – their income (and therefore quality of life) equalizes because all services are needed, while their impact grows maximum because everyone is realizing their best talent. What feminists did was destroying natural division so that women break their spine gold mining, while men stagnate, their masculine character softens and effeminizes until they are no more suitable for their natural role – protection of nation.
What liberals did in Europe was legalizing “freedom, equality, fraternity” without having them in reality. They want just put an ape together with a human being and legalize their “equality” without making them equal. Equality is the last thing such act results in. If you grant equal rights to a human and to an ape, it ends with an ape having all rights and a human having no rights – no right even to survive, since after some time an ape will want to eat and to fuck somebody.
The movie Dog’s heart after the novel of Great Russian writer Bulgakov is the best example of how liberalism works in real life. They gave a dog a brain of a dead human criminal and gave it “equal rights” with humans. This movie had a happy end, since it was yet not too late, they managed to turn it into a dog again.
To have equal rights with humans you have to BE human first.
Ethics
BLM activist advocates white genocide at Harvard
Liberals take ethics very seriously…….
– Should I kill myself, like, under your argument?
– Sure
– Should my debate partner kill himself?
– I don’t see why not.
– Why should we kill ourselves?
– It’s ethical.
– How is it ethical?
– Cuz you have white privilege.
– Why shouldn’t I better struggle against the structure?
– Struggling against the structure means putting yourself on the line. Putting your body on the line. Do it. Affirm your suicide.
Much more ethical to kill yourself than to live and sustain your old mother who worked for you all her life. Much more ethical to go against a system that gave you your life and the privilege that your forefathers worked hard for, than to sustain this system, to procreate this life and to regain this privilege so your future generations can enjoy it also.
Muslims Interogate Comedian about Insulting Islam, but unfortunately he has all the Answers…
Look at how “liberal muslims” put Dutch man on a fake “pain-bench” (traditional muslim torture if real) for a joke he afforded about islam.
70% women in the world and 91% women in muslim countries are facing non-ending violence. It is not an insult. However, a non-violent Dutch man calling islam for what it is, is insult.
Jordan
91% of university students polled by the Jordanian Human Right Center approve of wife beating. An earlier study by another organization found out that a majority of WOMEN also supports the right of a husband to beat the wife
According to the [National Family Council] report:
83% of Jordanian women approve of wife beating if the woman cheats on her husband
60% approve of wife beating in cases where the wife burns a meal she’s cooking
52% approve of wife beating in case where she’s refused to follow the husband’s orders
These welfare-dwelling taxes-dwelling she-apes attack Dutch citizen they feed off, for bringing joy to his people because joy is unethical. However, protect their wife-beating ape husbands because wife beating is ethical.
To laugh when smb farts right before your nose in public is unethical, yet to go to parasitize on the other country, to beat, to shit, to rape and to welfare-dwell there, is ethical.
WOMEN MUST WATCH The Reality COMING TO YOUR TOWNS A MUST SHARE Video
Islam is about:
1. Paedophilia
2. Woman-Rape
3. Woman-beating
4. Wife-beating
5. Animal-rape
6. Genocide
7. Telling lies [6]
It is ethical. But to sing a song is unethical.
A religion of peace
Sorry, liberals. There’s only 1 interpretation of Islam — Muhammad’s
No abrahamic [jewish-originated] faith can ever be “a religion of peace”, because abrahamic god is a warrior; Yahweh is his name [Exodus 15:3].
“Islam is a religion of peace” – George W. Bush about 9/11 attacks.
“Allah is a best of shimmers” – Quran.
“Ah, Lord GOD! Surely, thou hast greatly deceived this people” – Jeremiah 4:10
Allah/jehovah, I see that you are the best of shimmers and that you have greatly deceived this people, but I also have smth to tell them. And as I am not the best of shimmers, I will tell the truth:
“A RELIGION OF PEACE” DOES NOT EXIST.
Religion is tribal and tribes are at war. Any and all religions are man-made and men are at war, does not matter whether they are earthling men, ET men, immortal men – they are life beings. Religion is life being made and all life is at war.
Pagan [non-abrahamic, Gentile-originated] religions allow peace only among your own. Inside your own family. Pagan Gods are Ancestors of Pagans. Pagan bloodline going enough far leads to our Gods. Since they are Ancestors, they are family. We worship our family and NO ONE else. This is a core of a Pagan religion.
Abrahamic religion does not allow peace anywhere at all. A war between different Gentile divisions of an abrahamic religion is a war in the end of which, according this religion, everyone must die. Because this religion worships a jew, who is an enemy to everyone.
No religion can be absolutely “a religion of peace” including liberalism. Liberals welcome murderers, rapists, maniacs, paedophiles… they worship beheading of their own country; liberalism is a religion of genocide since they welcome genocide. The only difference: this is genocide of your own. Liberalism is not a religion of peace either; it is a religion of war as well as any other – just this war is against your own.
The legend states that at the time of Ragnarök Fenrir will overthrow his chain of lies and become free again.
References
- ↑ Flickr Commons project, 2010
- ↑ “Democracy” and Dictatorship
- ↑ Sweden: Rape Capital of the West
- ↑ Wikipedia – for research on political governmental structure of countries
- ↑ TRUSTLAW POLL-Afghanistan is most dangerous country for women
- ↑ Wikiislam